ClamWin Free Antivirus Forum Index
ClamWin Free Antivirus
Support and Discussion Forums
Reply to topic
Unofficial malware signatures
vittorio93


Joined: 20 Apr 2012
Posts: 0
Location: Italy
Reply with quote
Hi community, today i found this on the web

https://www.securiteinfo.com/services/clamav_unofficial_malwares_signatures.shtml https://www.securiteinfo.com/services/clamav_unofficial_malwares_signatures.shtml

it's talkin about unofficial signatures for clamav database to use with clamwin too.
did you know this project?
what do you think about it?

Thank you Very Happy
PS: You're great
View user's profileSend private message
GuitarBob


Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 9
Location: USA
Reply with quote
I do not speak French, so I am unfamiliar with that web page, but you can prepare unofficial signatures for Clam AV if you use Clam. ClamWin uses the Clam AV signature database, so any signatures prepared for Clam AV can be used by ClamWin also.

There are some instructions on the web for preparing Clam AV signatures. Do a search for "unofficial Clam AV signatures."

Regards,
View user's profileSend private message
Re: Unofficial malware signatures
tizef


Joined: 24 Feb 2012
Posts: 0
Location: France
Reply with quote
GuitarBob wrote:
I do not speak French, so I am unfamiliar with that web page, […]

GuitarBob, that web page speaks two languages : French and English ;-)

vittorio93 wrote:
[…] talkin about unofficial signatures for clamav database to use with clamwin too.

There are several unofficial databases projects like this. You may also be interested in the Sanesecurity’s ClamAV web page. Have you heard about ClamSup (a part of tBB’s ClamAV for Windows project) before ? Although that project is reported dead you could find here an old (two years) version of ClamSup. Apparently danq has been using Malware Patrol’s signatures for years.


Last edited by tizef on Sat Mar 23, 2013 8:52 pm; edited 1 time in total
View user's profileSend private message
GuitarBob


Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 9
Location: USA
Reply with quote
Thanks, tizef--I didn't notice the English on the left side of the web page. The HDB signatures are MD5 file hashes, which are a quick mathmatical representation of a file. HDB sigs are good, valid signatures, but they are very specific and are only good for that one virus in that one file. Most viruses today are changed very frequently (sometimes hourly via automated tools) to avoid detection by AVs. Clam uses them when they can't get a more specific signature. Many AVs use them so they can get a quick signature in an effort to deal with the thousands of virus samples they get every day. The utility of these particular signatures depends upon the quality of person/organizations preparing them and their attention/frequency as to the maintenance of their database.

The good thing about Clam AV/ClamWin is that you can prepare your own signatures. The HDB sigs consist of: filehash:filesize:VirusType.VirusName. The file hash is computed with a file hashing program that computes MD5 file hashes.

Regards,
View user's profileSend private message
GuitarBob


Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 9
Location: USA
Reply with quote
Clam AV has now informed users on its web site that it will accept user-prepared signatures that are pasted in the comments section when they submit a file. Clam will check the signature, make sure there are no false positive detections, and publish it in their official database and give the user credit in the email that is sent out to email subscribers when the signatures are published. Be sure to attach the infected file.

The Clam signatures are also now automated, with hourly updates. This is a good improvement that will provide users, including ClamWin users, with better protection.

Regards,
View user's profileSend private message
Unofficial malware signatures
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
All times are GMT  
Page 1 of 1  

  
  
 Reply to topic