![]() |
| Detecting Conficker |
|
GuitarBob
|
To my knowledge, Clam is not involved in the AV group that was looking into capturing the domain names that Conficker uses (and will use). Clam also doesn't have a dedicated Conficker tool to repair/vaccinate for Conficker. These anit-Conficker measures were/are developed by the larger AV companies with more resources. Clam (and ClamWin by default) concentrates upon getting signatures from samples sent in by users, and it does a pretty good job at that. Clam also doesn'do any registry scanning--unless a registry entry is included in a signature. That's interesting about the Conficker vaccine--I wasn't aware of it. Thanks.
The majority of Clam users are still email services, and the signatures reflect that. That's why I would like to see more ClamWin usiers submitting undetected samples to Clam--that would (probably) reflect a greater variety of samples and perhaps improve detection rates a bit. Conficker is more sophisticated than other viruses, but if you keep up with Microsoft's patches, update ClamWin often, and run a real-time scanner, firewall, and anti-spyware alongside ClamWin, you shouldn't have to spend any time worrying especially about it. Regards, |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Detecting Conficker |
|
||
|
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
Design by phpBBStyles.com | Styles Database.
Content © ClamWin Free Antivirus GNU GPL Free Software Open Source Virus Scanner. Free Windows Antivirus. Stay Virus Free with Free Software.
Design by phpBBStyles.com | Styles Database.
Content © ClamWin Free Antivirus GNU GPL Free Software Open Source Virus Scanner. Free Windows Antivirus. Stay Virus Free with Free Software.


