ClamWin Free Antivirus Forum Index
ClamWin Free Antivirus
Support and Discussion Forums
Reply to topic
More False Positives
mxracer


Joined: 14 Dec 2010
Posts: 0
Reply with quote
After my scan this morning ClamWin quarantined your own update files????????

This app has been my favorite for a long time for it's stability, what happened?
View user's profileSend private message
GuitarBob


Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 9
Location: USA
Reply with quote
ClamWin's signatures come from the Clam AV people. You should report all false positives (and undetected viruses) to Clam AV, starting at https://www.clamav.net/lang/en/sendvirus/ on the web. In the case of a false positive, on the upload form change the description from "virus" to "false positive." It also helps to tell the exact name of the falsely-detected virus in the Comments section of the form.

This particular signature has probably been dropped by now. If it is still a false detection, please submit it.

Regards,
View user's profileSend private message
Re: More False Positives
Lipper


Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 0
Location: USA
Reply with quote
@ mxracer

Most ClamWin users should have the scanner set to Report Only, not Quarantine.
View user's profileSend private message
False positives with ClamWin and not ClamAV
ancientt


Joined: 17 Apr 2009
Posts: 0
Location: Texas
Reply with quote
When ClamWin identifies a virus, I always upload it to jotti.org to see what other scanners do. One of those scanners is a ClamAV scanner which in many cases does not flag the file as a virus. This used to be much more common, but it happened again today with MAPI from an XP install CD backup.

Is there some reason that ClamAV on jotti should not detect a virus when ClamWin does?
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail
GuitarBob


Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 9
Location: USA
Reply with quote
The detection should be the same since ClamWin uses the Clam AV signature database. One difference, could be if one of the scanners (either your local scanner or the online service) has a more recently-updated signature database. You may (like me) update your local ClamWin scanner hourly. I do not know how often Jotti updates, but I do not think it is hourly. So that could explain a difference on occasion.

Another difference (very infrequent) is because ClamWin is a Windows port of the Clam AV code, and there could be a slight difference in the ported code that could change the detection. This happened late last year when ClamWin code was not updated to take advantage of some new Clam AV detection capability and registered lots of false positives that knocked out network users.

Regards,
View user's profileSend private message
More False Positives
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
All times are GMT  
Page 1 of 1  

  
  
 Reply to topic