| sherpya
 
 
 
			| Joined: 22 Mar 2006 |  | Posts: 0 |  | Location: Italy |    |  | 
	
		|  Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 3:33 pm |  |  |  |  
		|  |  |  WARNING: Invalid DNS reply. Falling back to HTTP mode. 
 uh?
 
 can you create
 
 HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters\ClamWinNameServer
 
 as string containing a working nameserver pls?
 | 
	| 
 | 
	| arscw
 
 
 
			| Joined: 21 Mar 2008 |  | Posts: 0 |  | Location: USA - Tampa, FL |    |  | 
	
		|  Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 3:44 pm |  |  |  |  
		|  |  |  The WARNING was from the previous run earlier before testing with your new executable. The latest entry at the ***bottom*** shows no WARNING. I just included the old output so you can appreciate the problem WAS indeed solved in the new freshclam.exe. There is no more WARNING using the new executable. There are two database load log entries on the post. | 
	| 
 | 
	| sherpya
 
 
 
			| Joined: 22 Mar 2006 |  | Posts: 0 |  | Location: Italy |    |  | 
	
		|  Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 11:59 pm |  |  |  |  
		|  |  |  0.93c is out, freshclam.exe is fixed and clamscan adds memory scanner
 https://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/clamwin/clamwin-legacy-nt4-0.93c.exe https://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/clamwin/clamwin-legacy-nt4-0.93c.exe
 
 if the link does not work, please try later
 | 
	| 
 | 
	| arscw
 
 
 
			| Joined: 21 Mar 2008 |  | Posts: 0 |  | Location: USA - Tampa, FL |    |  | 
	
		|  Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 1:06 pm |  |  |  |  
		|  |  |  Downloaded and tested 0.93c:
 installation
 download database - gui & batch
 disk scan - gui & batch
 mail notify - test mode
 memory scan - gui & batch
 
 Everything seemed to run fine.
 
 I am still curious about the difference in execution times between 0.92 and 0.93c. The latest time for a scan of C: and D: is down to 33min 44sec under 0.93c. Like I said before, 0.92 used to take over 80 minutes !! There is no relevant difference in disk space between the tests.
 
 Thanks again for all your help and efforts.
 | 
	| 
 | 
	| sherpya
 
 
 
			| Joined: 22 Mar 2006 |  | Posts: 0 |  | Location: Italy |    |  | 
	
		|  Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 7:56 pm |  |  |  |  
		|  |  |  - the scanner engine of 0.93 is faster (clamav developers improved it)
- new limits handling avoid scanning of unneeded files
 | 
	| 
 |