ClamWin Free Antivirus Forum Index
ClamWin Free Antivirus
Support and Discussion Forums
Reply to topic
System low in virtual memory
DucatiDesmoSedici


Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Posts: 2
Location: ITALY
Reply with quote
Hello!
with the last clamWin version, in Windows XP.
Yesterday before leaving I did the scan of all my hard drive (C, D, E, F).
This morning, coming back, I red the windows error that the system is going low in virtual memory...
maybe the message was: "Your system is low on virtual memory. Windows is increasing the size of your virtual memory paging file. During this process, memory requests for some applications may be denied."
I had 4 or 5 messages like this, and after, the last message was the application error of ClamWin.
I am sorry if I can't be more precisely but I didn't red it with much attention... tonight I will do the same and tell if it works or not.
Seems there's a leak of memory...
greetings,
Filippo
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail
confirmed
DucatiDesmoSedici


Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Posts: 2
Location: ITALY
Reply with quote
Also today I found the error, now I can be more explicit:

FIRST ERROR:
"Your system is low on virtual memory. Windows is increasing the size of your virtual memory paging file. During this process, memory requests for some applications may be denied."

CLAMWIN ERROR:
"ClamWin.exe, error in instruction 0x00d930e4 reference memory at 0x00d930e4. The memory could not be written."
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail
alch
Site Admin

Joined: 27 Nov 2005
Posts: 1751
Reply with quote
it doesn't mean that clamwin was consuming a lot of memory, but it is possible. Would be good to monitor the clamwin process in task manager whilst it is happening.
View user's profileSend private message
System low in virtual memory
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
All times are GMT  
Page 1 of 1  

  
  
 Reply to topic