ClamWin Free Antivirus Forum Index
ClamWin Free Antivirus
Support and Discussion Forums
Reply to topic
ClamWin Vs ClamAV
Ferasi


Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Posts: 1
Location: Clifton
Reply with quote
I have been using ClamWin https://thinkmobiles.com/blog/best-free-antimalware/for a few months now without any issue. But I thought I would have a look at the base ClamAV. Just a quick look shows that its ClamScan.Exe is 43kb in size compared to the ClamWins version which is 723kb. I am guessing that this is due to libraries and the like being directly linked to the ClamWin version instead of using.Dll's. This was just my first look but I am sure there will be other differences too.

Has anyone got any ideas or have you used the ClamAV version with ME instead of the ClamWin version?

Thanks

Eric


Last edited by Ferasi on Fri Aug 14, 2020 6:23 am; edited 3 times in total
View user's profileSend private message
GuitarBob


Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 4670
Location: USA
Reply with quote
A lot of ClamWin users have encountered slow times loading the signature database and also slow scan times. This has gotten so bad for me that, after using ClamWin as a backup scanner since 2006, I have discontinued it. I have been told that an attempt has been made to speed up things in recent Clam AV versions, but the ClamWin developer has not updated ClamWin since March of 2018. I have not had much contact with him for a while now, and I thnk ClamWin is on its last legs. As soon as the remaining Win 98 users leave it, I think he will discontinue it.

There are just too many hoops for me to jump through if I use Clam AV's Windows version that it's just not worth it. Being a Linux email server application, they don't do much to help Windows users.

Regards,
View user's profileSend private message
ClamWin Vs ClamAV
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
All times are GMT  
Page 1 of 1  

  
  
 Reply to topic